|
|
MEDIA REPLIES TO NEWS ITEM CONCERNING MYALGIC ENCEPHALOMYELITIS
Media Contacts Needed We are trying to build up a database of media contacts for ME Awareness etc. We would particularly like contact names & email addresses. Please send them to the group office. Thanks!
Media Items in June Newsletter 06 Letters to the Editor, Disability Now June 2006 After reading your news focus on the use of the Human Rights Act (DN, May, page 18) I thought readers should hear my story. In 2000, my occupational therapy department decided I needed a profile bed with carer-lifting so my carers could give me bed-baths. My physio also thought this was a good idea as I am unable to leave my bed and have had back pain from being propped up with pillows and slipping. As I was sleeping in a double bed with my husband, I asked for a double bed. This was refused as the authority would only pay for a single bed. We offered to pay for the other half of the bed, but this was refused and stalemate ensued for 18 months, with letters passing back and forth. I took advice from the Disability Law Centre, which advised mentioning Article 8 of the Act – the right to private and family life. My advisor also told me to mention we had offered to pay for the bed, so the authority would have no legal defence. I sent these comments and said I would wait three weeks for a reply. If unfavourable, I would take them to court. Within three hours the authority had discovered enough money to buy the whole of my double profile bed, which was installed in December 2001. It has made a phenomenal difference to my life. If something similar happened in future, I would have no hesitation in using the Act again. Sue Firth, Halifax -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disability now - Health News (June 2006) By Priya Kotecha
Disability campaigners have called on the government to plough greater resources into finding a treatment for ME, following claims of misdiagnosis and mistreatment by the NHS.
The 25% ME Group, which represents people with the most severe forms of the condition, accused the government of "wasting millions on inappropriate treatment" by using psychological therapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy to help treat patients with ME.
The group said: "The government has chosen to pour many millions of pounds worth of public money into funding psychologically-based treatments and management strategy therapies, which simply do not work for ME patients and indeed can cause more harm to ME sufferers." The national support group claims 95 per cent of its members who had tried such therapies reported a worsening of their symptoms.
Instead, it is calling for the government to redirect resources into researching the physical causes of the illness, which they say is currently being funded through private donations.
Action for ME, another ME charity, said psychological therapies can help "as a coping strategy to manage the illness", but reinforced calls for "fully funded biomedical research."
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health said: "It is for clinicians to decide how best to treat their patients."
She said the government had invested £8.5 million in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME services via the Medical Research Council (MRC).
The MRC said it would fund proposals which had an "alternative approach" but that nothing of sufficient quality had yet been proposed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastern Daily Press, 5th April 2006 By Greg Crowhurst I have spent 12 years caring for my wife, who has severe ME, and even though each day is a day of indescribable agony, I am greatly distressed by the news of a £503,000 lottery grant to UEA for ME/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research, to be led by the charity Action for ME. I believe Action for ME has "sold out" to the powerful British psychiatric lobby, which pursues a discredited policy of behavioural intervention and graded exercise therapy.There is not one published paper, as opposed to opinion, proving that ME/CFS is a psychiatric condition, while more than 2000 papers have been published internationally proving that ME/CFS is a neurological, physical illness and that graded exercise especially is dangerous to sufferers. This research is bad news for sufferers, it looks like being a waste of scarce money that could be better spent on physical research and it will simply condemn sufferers like my wife to even more years of agony. This research has nothing to offer the ME community. What is desperately needed is physical research to find a cure. Not one penny of government funding has yet been committed to this. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Jerome Burne A drug used to treat herpes infections has produced a dramatic improvement in patients severely affected by ME, or chronic fatigue syndrome. Sufferers who for years had been unable to leave their homes now report being able to resume normal life. This is a remarkable result for a treatment for this complex and controversial disorder that is thought to affect as many as 240,000 people in Britain and for which there is no cure. The results, reported at a scientific conference earlier this month by Professor Jose Montoya of Stanford University in California, involved 12 patients who had been given the powerful drug, valganciclovir, which targets the human herpes virus (HHV-6). Nine of the patients experienced a great improvement. One of Montoya's cases was onetime champion figure skater Donna Flowers, now aged 50 and working as a physiotherapist, who lives in California's Silicon Valley. "Two years ago, I was spending 14 hours a day in bed and my brain was so fogged I couldn't write a letter," she says. "I wasn't functioning at all. I'd been diagnosed with chronic fatigue, but the doctors didn't have anything to offer. I had to employ a full-time nanny just to look after my three-year old twins. However, she is now back at work, treating young Olympic hopefuls, the nanny has gone and she's just started ballet lessons. "When Donna came to see us, her energy levels were around 10 per cent of what she considered normal," says Montoya. "Today, she is functioning at 90 per cent." One patient who could barely walk around the block is now cycling three hours a day, while another who could not even get down the stairs to breakfast is now up every day at 7am. The professor reported his findings at a conference on the HHV-6 virus, which was held in Barcelona earlier this month. While it's well known that some patients with CFS have signs of various viral infections, this is the first time that treating one of the viruses has been shown to be so effective. "I was amazed by the results," Says Montoya, who runs the infectious diseases clinic at Stanford. "Donna was sent to me because high levels of another virus (Epstein Barr) had been detected in her system. "I found high levels of HHV-6 virus as well, so I treated her with valganciclovir to bring down her viral load. "I'd hoped it might help a bit, but I didn't expect the results to be anything like as dramatic. It was pure serendipity." Valganciclovir is licensed to treat HHV-6 infections of the eye, which can affect transplant or cancer patients with severely weakened immune systems. HHV-6 is not the same as the herpes virus responsible for cold sores. Most commonly, it causes roseola infantum in children, who get a fever and a rash. "I have treated hundreds of immune compromised patients with the drug, so I am very familiar with it," says Montoya. "It can have serious side-effects so you have to monitor patients very carefully. But so far none of the CFS/ME patients have reacted badly to it." All the experts agree that a lot more research will have to be done before valganciclovir can be widely used as a treatment. "There is a long history of linking CFS/ME with some sort of viral infection," says Charles Shepherd, a medical advisor to the charity Action for ME. "About 75 per cent of cases begin with an infection which the patient never properly recovers from, so it is quite likely infectious agents lurk in the body. While the role of HHV-6 is certainly plausible, we will have to wait for a larger trial that is properly controlled." Montoya agrees. "These were individual cases and it is always possible the results were due to a placebo effect," he says. "However, that is unlikely because we saw a worsening of each patient's condition around week three to four of the treatment, probably when infected cells were dying off. After that came the improvement. "That is not a pattern you get with placebos. But we don't know yet why the drug makes such a difference." The possibility that valganciclovir could eventually provide an effective treatment for some cases of CFS is just part of a wider picture. Over the past year, genetic research has provided a new understanding of the disease that could eventually lead to new therapies. For years, the conventional view has been that there is no known cause, no way to diagnose it and no effective treatment Some doctors and health workers believe it is the result of social and psychological factors – and best treated with psychotherapy and exercise. Now it is becoming clear these patients have "a disturbance in their body's natural way of dealing with infection," says Malcolm Hooper, Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry at the University of Sunderland. "Anti-viral drugs such as valganciclovir may be allowing it to re-set itself." Hooper was one of the speakers at a conference in London for ME Awareness Day on Friday. Another speaker was Dr Jonathan Kerr of St George's Medical School in London, who recently published groundbreaking work on the links between genes and CFS/ME. "We've found that the genes in patients' white blood cells – a key part of the immune system – are switched on and off in an abnormal fashion," he says. The hope is that a relatively old drug, called interferon beta, can help to restore the balance. A controlled trial is planned. What researchers such as Kerr find disheartening is that there seems to be little official support for this biological-based research in Britain. The bulk of the funding has gone to the psychological approach. But many hope a parliamentary inquiry looking at the progress of CFS/ME research will find that research involving genes, viruses and the immune system would benefit patients. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Daily Record (Letters Section) 11th May 06 Dr John Greensmith, Bristol As this is ME Awareness Week, I'd like to point out that some sufferers who are reasonably mobile are frustrated, when out and about, by folk saying "you always look fine when I see you". A moment's thought will tell you that when you do not see them it is because they are not well enough to come out. Many chronic, even terminal illnesses such as cancer have no outward signs yet do not provoke such disbelief. The more severely affected people are with ME, the more invisible they become. One brave lady prepared to break this culture is Linda Crowhurst. Her 12-year struggle – and call for funding for research into ME – can be followed on www.25megroup.org. She represents 30,000 to 40,000 folk who are housebound or rarely go out -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have they found a cure for ME? Wandsworth Borough News By Saxon East A Tooting-based doctor is giving hope to ME sufferers after discovering a potential cause and treatment for the mysterious illness. Dr Jonathan Kerr, who leads a four-strong team based at St George's Hospital, believes ME sufferers have white blood cells that behave abnormally when triggered by an outside virus, such as Epstein-Barr. This leads to symptoms such as fatigue – ME is often referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome – weakness, headaches and disrupted sleep. Many doctors have dismissed ME as a psychological illness, to the despair of sufferers, but Dr Kerr's research could lead to a diagnostic test and treatment.
Dr Kerr said: "We first need to work out how ME is caused and that is what we are doing. We can then use that information for a treatment.
"We have our first experimental drug planned for this year. It is a known drug but we will be using it for a different purpose." The drug, interferon, is currently used for multiple sclerosis patients. Dr Kerr will be giving talks in Ireland and London during ME Awareness Week which starts next Sunday, May 7. Explaining his devotion to research, Dr Kerr said: "The reason we have taken it up is because ME is an unknown area and research is very badly needed. "We are disappointed that it has been dismissed as being all in the mind. "For this reason we are taking it on." Tony Golding, from Network Mesh, a support group for ME Sufferers in Wandsworth and across London, praised the work of Dr Kerr's team. Mr Golding said: "There is plenty of evidence that there are differences in both the brains and the blood of people with ME. But the question is what to do about it. "Of course, any research and possible treatment is good. ME is an illness that affects at least 150,000 people in this country." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letters that appeared in December 05 Newsletter
Story about one of our members that appeared in the Daily Mail Trapped in bed for 14 years with chronic fatigue
Replies to the above article PERMISSION TO FORWARD, REPOST, OR USE IN NEWSLETTERS. ____________________________________________________ Reply to article (online) about our member Lynn Gilderdale
that had her Dear Editor, Subject: /color>
Love of writing made it plain sailing for Clare" [Francis], The Weekly News, 1
October 2005.
ME, Royal Free Disease
and a psychiatric obsession
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4084631.stm /bigger>/bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
- BBC News report/bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>
Re: Capital clinic gives hope to ME sufferers - Ruth Armstrong, Health Reporter. (Edinburgh Evening News, Wednesday, 17 March, 2004) The Times (July 21, page 3)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1702267,00.html
Another Reply Re: Capital clinic gives hope to ME sufferers - Ruth Armstrong, Health Reporter. (Edinburgh Evening News, Wednesday, 17 March, 2004) The Times (July 21, page 3) http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1702267,00.html
It has been expressed in another reply that a ”national specialist M.E. centres are desperately required is not in dispute. It is the kind of treatment they offer that is highly controversial, hotly contested and which causes great anxiety” The study that is being proposed is not only a complete waste of public money, but it is also short sighted. We have patient reporting to show that such ‘treatments’ as Cognitive Behaviour therapy and Graded Exercise Therapy, are unhelpful and even make patients suffering from ME worse. On the ‘treatment’ GET, it was reported that of those who tried this ‘treatment’ (39%), 82% were made worse. CBT had a similar result. I am particularly concerned that those who are controlling the purse strings are listening to the wrong ‘experts’, something that has already come unstuck in the recent past. Treating this physiological disease with psychological methods is a medical mistake, we should be promoting biomedical research along the lines that is being done by MERGE – a Scottish Research group in Perth. People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, already feel let down by the lack of services and proper research into this devastating disease that has wrecked so many lives, lets be serious about helping these people with real research studies into the causes and hopefully find treatments that will relieve the suffering that so many have to endure Simon Lawrence 25% ME GROUP – support for severe ME sufferers
The Editor Scotsman Publications Ltd Regent Court 76 West Regent Street Glasgow G2 9th January 2004 Dear Sir Response from the 25% ME Group (Support Group for severe ME Sufferers) to Simon Wessely’s letter to the Scotsman (“Research goes on”) 5th January 2004 As a patient-led support organisation for severe sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), we wish to applaud Margaret Cook’s article which appeared in the Scotsman on 6th Oct 2003 for its forthright honesty in reporting what the patients, carers and families of those suffering with ME had to say about how the illness affects them and how they feel they have been treated (and mistreated) by some parts of the medical profession. Although Wessely, in his response states that “The evidence shows that the average family doctor is now more understanding and sympathetic to sufferers than before”, from many patients’ experiences, this is actually often not the case, even following the publication of the Chief Medical Officer’s Report on CFS/ME and similar publications. We feel, it is astonishing that in the 21st Century the burden remains on the patient to fight to achieve true recognition for the illness that they are suffering from, whatever illness that may be! It seems apparent to us that the medical profession (although saying they are listening to patients) may actually be interpreting what is being said by the patient to their own ends and then dictating forms of “treatment” and “services” for them. At best, they are lumping ME together with other Chronic Fatigue Syndromes and wrongly applying those treatments that may indeed work with some CFS patients but which will not (in the majority of cases) actually be of any benefit to those suffering from ME. Wessely, in his response in the Scotsman on 5th January, states “I have been saying for 15 years that this is a real illness, based on my experiences listening to over one thousand patients…” However, based upon a transcript of a lecture given by Wessely on 12th May 1994 at the 9th Eliot Slater Memorial Lecture, which has also been highlighted in a separate response to the Scotsman, it is quite evident that he did not always hold such views when he stated at said lecture, “I’m going to talk not about an illness, but about an idea” and further stated that “I will argue that ME is simply a belief, the belief that one has an illness called ME.” This along with many other publications by Wessely et al over the past 15 years, clearly indicates that he does not hold ME to be a real and distinct neurological condition, as accepted by the World Health Organisation ICD10 G 93.3, but rather refers to ME as an “hysterical” condition which merits treatment on a “purely” psychological basis.
He also (along with some other of his fellow researchers) continues to confuse and distort the differences between CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and ME. Therefore, rather than dealing with ME as a distinct neurological condition, instead continues to apply to it the umbrella term of CFS (which is a collective term for all types of fatigue conditions, many with a probable underlying psychological basis). As pointed out by Wessely in his response, it certainly is “a scandal” that there are no, or very few services available for ME sufferers (especially for those who are severely affected by the disease). However, we found it extremely offensive that he chose to express the fact that he and his team in South London had set up a “service” in order to treat CFS and ME sufferers. Unfortunately, the “treatments” currently offered by such “services” to patients with ME, are ones that have clearly been shown by past and present patient reporting (such reports having been ignored by certain elements of the medical profession) to be the most harmful forms of treatment to ME sufferers, especially those who are moderately or severely affected by the illness. Many such sufferers who have in the past undertaken these forms of “treatment” whilst they were moderately affected, have since joined our Support Group (for the Severely Affected) because, as a result of such treatments, they have now become wheelchair, house or even bed-bound! Feedback received from our membership, many of whom have used GET (Graded Exercise Therapy) in the past, indicates that 83% were made worse by this treatment and the figures for CBT (Cognitive Behaviour Therapy) were very similar. Another patient organisation also reported large numbers of ME sufferers being made worse by such forms of treatment. It therefore seems incredulous that public funds (in the amount of 2.6 million) have been made available in order to test these “treatments” further, despite very disappointing outcomes with regard to previous research studies and patient reporting. Wessely also states “There are now evidence based treatments available, whilst they don’t cure, do make a difference”. This flies in the face of the above and many other research papers showing that this is simply not the case. In terms of research, we don’t want just “any research” as stated by Wessely in his response. Indeed, we feel the research that is being conducted at present is not the most effective for ME sufferers. Previous research studies, some of which have been available since the middle of the last century, clearly outline the physical and biological abnormalities caused by this disease. We already have research units like MERGE in Perth, Scotland, and the CFS Research Foundation in England, that are carrying out significant scientific research studies but they are not receiving the public funding required to further such work, but rather we have millions being spent on psychological-based approaches which, in the end, will not unravel the underlying cause of the condition. (This is akin to a sticking plaster being applied to a broken leg!) From Wessely’s final paragraph, it is quite apparent that he still wishes to denigrate those suffering from ME (even though he expressed in his response that he listens to patients) when he referred to the sufferers and carers who spoke to Dr Cook at the Scottish Cross Party Meeting as “activists” rather than patients who are forced to fight for true recognition of their condition and the suffering that they endure daily, not only caused by the disease itself, but also by the demonization of the condition by certain elements of the medical profession. It has been expressed in some quarters (even by one of the leading ME support organisations) that such “activists” are actually hindering and demonising doctors such as Wessely and his colleagues, but it should always be remembered that it is the sufferer who has experience of living with this condition and the problems that entails, and it is not the clinician who must endure the stigmatisation which still accompanies this disease.
Yours faithfully Simon Lawrence 25% ME Group
"Telegraph UK Student health special: beware of first-term burn-out To compare a severely disabling neuro/immuno/endocrine illness to student burn-out is absolutely unacceptable. Mr Britton made a comment saying; "there's a thin line between student ennui and full-blown ME". And there seems to be a collation between fatigue and the neurological condition (ME) within this article.
ME patients have struggled to have the severity of the illness recognised in the face of ignorance and prejudice, much of which is based on the assumption that ME is something to do with fatigue. As research has finally proved how ill we actually are it is shocking to see the confusion caused by some points in this article
To be seriously ill and not taken seriously is not just frustrating, degrading and humiliating, more prosaically it leads to lack of medical care, lack of treatment, lack of funds for research and decades in bed too ill to take part in the life we used to have.
Hayley Klinger Media Relations 25%MEGroup enquiry@25megroup.org www.25megroup.org 21 Church Street Troon Ayrshire KA10 6HT
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/main.jhtml?xml=/health/2005/08/22/hreverse22.xml&sSheet=/health/2005/08/24/ixhmain.html
Sir Your article about the recovery of Christina Hopkinson from chronic fatigue syndrome with the help of reverse therapy highlights a problem that ME sufferers have faced in their fight to have the disease taken seriously. You have confused chronic fatigue syndrom (CFS) and ME and assumed they are the same illness. The critical distinction is that ME is classified as a serious neurological illness alongside MS and Motor neurone disease by the world Health Organisation as ICD-10, 93.3, whilst chronic fatigue states are classified as mental health disorders. This would explain why talking therapies can help some patients with a diagnosis of chronic fatigue but cannot and do not cure ME. The 25%MEGroup represents the interests of severely ill ME patients, many of whom are so ill that they are totally bedridden, some of whom are wholly dependent on carers for the basic functions of daily living and others who are lucky enough to be able to leave home in a wheelchair occasionally. None of us feel fatigued. We are all very ill and a vast amount of research demonstrates the immune/endocrine/neurological and cardiac abnormalities which cause such an extreme level of sickness. To be so ill and to be faced with a media and medical profession that cannot shake the thought that ME is somehow psychological has been devastating for thousands of sufferers, and has resulted in us being denied treatment, research and benefits. Your article about Christina has unfortunately contributed to the totally discredited view that ME is a trivial fatiguing illness which could be fixed if only sufferers would look into their personalities. The reality is that if you recover by changing the way you think, you did not have ME in the first place. /fontfamily>Hayley Klinger Media Relations 25%MEGroup
|