Sophia
was the youngest of my four
children. As a child she had
chicken pox. When she was 17 she
was a passenger in two separate car
crashes. Shortly afterwards, she
was hospitalized with suspected
meningitis and was given a lumbar
puncture. At 19 she went travelling
and working in Africa, before which
she had to have multiple
vaccinations. Whilst in Africa she
had two doses of malaria.

In 1999, Sophia got the ‘flu. She
could not recover from it. By
December of that year she could only
leave her bed to have a bath. In
June 2000, she was moved into the
tenth floor of a high-rise block of
flats. There, she would have a bath
each day where she relaxed for about
an hour. Within three months she
“crashed” and had become bed-bound.
I could not understand why, as she
had done nothing different during
this time.
I then heard about a carbon monoxide
detector. I bought one and sited it
near the ventilator shaft in the
bathroom. It registered positive
++. I informed the council and the
gas board who sent a man around to
see it. He flashed a torch around
in the shaft and said that it was
fine. He did not seem to understand
the seriousness of it and treated me
as if I were invisible. From that
point onwards any sort of chemical,
such as soap, powder, perfume,
detergent, cleaning liquids, car
fumes, etc. sent Sophia into further
decline. She was also badly
affected by electromagnetic fields,
which also included human beings.
The block of flats was filled with
TVs, radios, etc. She had also the
multiple symptoms of ME including
severe pain. She became even more
ill, if that were possible. She
also felt the building swaying in
the wind which, in turn, escalated
her symptoms. I had not realised
that architects build in a “sway
factor” to tall buildings in order
for them to remain stable.

Sophia’s
room had to be completely
“blacked-out” and she also wore eye
pads as any form of light seared her
eyes and affected her in other
ways. She had to wear ear plugs as
any noise or sound, even the sound
of a voice, made her even more ill.
She could not bear to be touched for
the same reason, even though she
craved the human touch and the
comfort it gave. Since that time
she had been unable to have either a
bath or a hair wash as water too
magnified her symptoms. She was
only able to lie on her right side.
She had, for most of this time, been
unable to speak. She had been
unable to read or write, listen to
the radio or have any electrical
gadgets in her room. She was unable
to have visitors. Her G.P. was at a
loss as to what to do. The G.P.
suggested that I put Sophia “away in
a home and get on with the rest of
my life”. I did not agree. Years
ago, I had nursed patients with all
sorts of diseases; never had I seen
anyone so profoundly ill in so many
diverse ways, as Sophia.

During one of my visits to Sophia’s
G.P., I was told that Sophia had
made herself ill and that I was
keeping her ill and as long as I was
looking after her she would never
recover. The G.P. said that it
would be better with me out of the
flat and independent carers
installed. In 2001, the G.P.
approached an M.E. clinic, telling
me, for legal protection of the G.P.
and the surgery. Sophia asked me to
research the clinic, which cost
thousands of pounds. They told me,
when I pressed them for long-term
results, that patients usually
revert to the point from whence they
started. I spoke to a couple of
ex-patients who were afraid to have
their names used; they said that
this clinic was run on the lines of
mental health and used Graded
Exercise, although it claimed to be
a neurological clinic. They also
said that when patients did not get
better that they were given a
different diagnosis before being
sent home. Sophia elected not to go
to the clinic.

By 2002, Sophia had to eat every 20
minutes, else her symptoms would
escalate to even more
severe heights. The doctor told me
that a number of psychiatrists had
been approached who had not wished
to be involved in such a case,
adding how lucky we were to finally
get one who would agree. I voiced
my fears that Sophia would be
removed from her flat; both the
doctor and subsequently the
psychiatrist assured me that this
would never happen. This proved
untrue, later.
I had already given the G.P. copies
of Margaret Williams’ “Denigration
by Design” and “Information for
Clinicians and Lawyers” by Marshall,
Williams and Hooper; I now gave
copies of these to the
psychiatrist. It would appear as if
neither of them had even read
these.
The psychiatrist visited Sophia for
20 minutes one morning.
The psychiatrist gave her no
physical examination, which I found
strange, given that her blood
pressure was 80/60 and was unable to
understand that Sophia’s “clock” was
constantly on the move and that
mostly her day-time was in our
night-time.
The psychiatrist did not seem to
understand any of her myriad
symptoms and the following day gave
a lecture on M.E. to a large number
of doctors; never having asked
Sophia for her consent.
The psychiatrist wanted me to be
present, though I had reservations,
and gave everyone there a handout
about Sophia and our family, (which
I only received later as part of the
pack of Sophia’s notes).
It read like a novel with some
horrendous so called “facts” that I
did not recognise as a true
representation. I was also shocked
at the misrepresentation of Sophia’s
symptoms to the doctors and started
to object, at which point I was
ushered out of the room.

The following week the psychiatrist
asked to see me at the hospital, in
a manner that I interpreted that
would not benefit Sophia if I
refused. I had no option but to
comply. I was told that if Sophia
refused to go to the M.E. clinic, or
if she did not recover within the
following 6 months, that she would
be sectioned under the Mental Health
Act, then added that if I tried to
stop this, then the psychiatrist
would go to the courts to have me
removed as the nearest relative.
Furthermore, if I did not open the
door when they would come to take
Sophia away, that the police would
be called to “smash the door down”.
When I asked how much better Sophia
would get by these proposed actions,
the reply was given that it was
“none of your business, that it was
for the courts to decide”. The
psychiatrist wanted to arrange for
me to see a psychologist so that I
could understand the good, that the
psychiatrist, was doing to Sophia.
I refused.

From January 2003, Sophia had
started to improve; she was able
to tolerate some light, talk,
sit up and have a few visitors.
This continued and I wrote in
detail to Sophia’s doctor,
informing
of the progress. The G.P. did
not want to know and said that
Sophia could no longer remain a
patient and that Sophia was
being passed over to a
colleague. Sophia asked for
copies of her notes. These were
given at the full price of £50,
having first been abridged in
case it would affect Sophia’s
“mental health”. Despite no
longer being her doctor, this
very same doctor, along with the
psychiatrist and social worker
tried to enter the flat to
section Sophia in May 2003.
They were not allowed in. I
then phoned the doctor and said
that Sophia was devastated and
that she did not want to be
sectioned and that she was
willing to go into a different
clinic. The doctor said “it’s
too late for that now”. The die
had been cast; they were
determined on their course of
action.

Between
January and June 2003, I wrote
letters to the Acting Chief
Executive of the NHS Primary Care
Trust and to many others, making
them aware of the situation and how
the World Health Organisation (WHO)
classification of ME, as a
neurological disease was being
ignored. No replies were received
from the Trust directly. I made a
video of Sophia, which I gave to a
solicitor. The solicitor visited
Sophia and assured both of us that
there was no way that Sophia
fulfilled the criteria of a person
who needed sectioning.

In July, the professionals returned
- as promised by the psychiatrist.
The police “smashed the door down”
and Sophia was taken to a locked
room within a locked ward of the
local mental hospital. Despite the
fact that she was bed-bound, she
reported that she did not receive
even basic nursing care, where her
temperature, pulse and blood
pressure (which had been 80/60),
were never taken. Sophia told me
that her bed was never made, that
she was never washed, her pressure
areas were never attended to and her
room and bathroom were not cleaned.
The nurse asked me to cook for
Sophia as the processed hospital
food made Sophia more ill. Sophia
also had to deal with all the nurses
constantly going into her room and
talking to her.

The psychiatrist made it quite clear
to Sophia’s solicitor that Sophia
would not be released. Sophia’s
solicitor then requested a tribunal,
which was held two weeks after
Sophia’s sectioning. The tribunal
lasted 8 hours.
They released
Sophia. It was too
late; the damage had
been done. Sophia
relapsed, not to
where she had been
before, in Spring
2003, but to a
hell-hole to which
she had never been.
She never recovered
from this
“treatment”. For
her it was the
equivalent of being
in a tsunami from
May - July, but this
one was man-made.
She never stood a
chance.

A few weeks later, her G.P. removed
Sophia from the practice list of
patients. I visited the new G.P.
who Sophia had been allocated to,
and asked what their personal views
on M.E. were? The response was that
it was a mental illness, but that
the new G.P. did not interfere with
the patients, but let them “get on
with it”. I thanked the G.P. and
left the surgery. From that point
on, Sophia never asked to see the
doctor, neither did the doctor ask
to see her. The hospital sent a
letter saying that we could now have
copies of Sophia’s notes - we had
been trying to get them for over 8
months. Within the letter from the
hospital they said that the
psychiatrist we had seen was no
longer working there. Within
these notes we saw correspondence
from Sophia’s first G.P. (who was
not mine), to the psychiatrist,
asking for me to be sectioned !! I
had not realised just how far that
G.P. was prepared to go in order to
have independent carers looking
after Sophia.
We tried to take legal action.
Funding was refused on the grounds
that … “there was insufficient
evidence of clinical negligence …
and that there were no significant
human rights issues which would
justify the use of public finds to
pursue this matter ... There is no
further right of review against this
decision”.

Between 2003 -2005,
Sophia struggled hourly / daily to
get back to the point of health she
had prior to her incarceration. By
July 2005, it seemed as if she had
started to progress. In September,
this monster of a disease took
another turn. Sophia had become
allergic to any and all types of
food. Physically, she could eat,
but the reactions were so severe,
e.g. knives stabbing into her head,
that this precluded her body being
able to accept the food. Five weeks
later, any sort of water or liquid
had similar devastating effects on
her; her glands would balloon-up and
she felt as if the circulation in
her legs was being cut off. She
could only bear about 4 fluid ounces
of water a day, which was used to
moisten her mouth. At the end of
October she got an ear infection.
Her head and neck swelled-up like a
football, she was in agonizing pain.
During these weeks, I asked her on a
regular basis if she wished me to
call a doctor? Her answer was
always the same, “no”. Way back in
2003, when she knew that the doctors
were treating her as a mental
patient, (and ignoring what the WHO
said about M.E), we discussed the
subject. She asked me never to let
a doctor near her who did not concur
with the WHO. I promised.

From Tuesday 22nd
November, Sophia could not move an
inch, neither could she sleep. On
Friday 25th she died. I
did not cry. I gave thanks that I
had been able to keep my word that
she would never be locked-up in a
mental hospital again. All my
grieving had been done during the
previous 6 years and especially
during the last 9 weeks, when I used
to walk the streets with tears
streaming down my face, knowing that
there was nothing that I could do to
help or comfort Sophia. Family and
friends came to say their goodbyes
to her. Four hours later, I phoned
the new doctors, only to be told
that Sophia had been removed from
their list since July of 2005. I
said that neither Sophia nor I had
removed her name. They did not seem
interested. The doctor did not come
out. I then called the ambulance
men, who in turn called the police
and the coroner’s staff. The
ambulance and police staff were
kindness itself.
Those last 9 weeks were something
else. I had to take the
responsibility for implementing
Sophia’s wishes. By virtue of this
monster of a disease, she still had
to remain in blackout conditions and
in isolation as to do otherwise
would automatically tip her into
another unknown hell. Even when I
knew she was in agony and that she
was virtually on her death-bed, she
could not have the comfort of me or
anyone even holding her hand or
sitting with her. I had to know
that my child was dying and do what
caused her least pain, irrespective
of my own feelings. We each had our
own agony, as did the rest of our
family and friends.


An autopsy was performed on Sophia.
No cause of death could be found. A
fortnight later more tests were
carried out with the same results.
Her heart was then sent away for
testing which still showed up no
abnormalities. Simon Lawrence from
the 25% ME Group asked us if we
would consider some research being
done on Sophia. We readily agreed
as we wanted others to benefit from
Sophia’s life and death. Sophia’s
spinal cord was taken away for
research by Dr Chaudhuri in Romford
and Dr O’Donovan in Cambridge.
Permission for this was granted by
the coroner. I understand that the
coroner was unusual in allowing such
research to be performed. Everyone
at that office was most helpful to
the two doctors involved. For this
I am so grateful.
The final tests have yet to be
completed, but up to the present
time the results of Sophia‘s spinal
cord show …
|
“unequivocal
inflammatory changes
affecting the special
nerve cell collections
(dorsal root ganglia)
that are the gateways
(or station) for all
sensations going to
brain through spinal
cord. The changes of
dorsal root ganglionitis
seen in 75% of Sophia‘s
spinal cord were very
similar to that seen
during active infection
by herpes viruses (such
as shingles).” |
They are continuing their
research and hope to publish their
paper when completed

The doctors, social workers, chief
executives, courts and others were
well informed in writing, by me, of
all the events that were about to
unfold in early 2003, and yet,
Sophia was “sectioned” as a result
of exercising her right not to go
into a particular ME Clinic. There
are many similar calamities being
reported of young M.E. patients
being separated from their families
behind the closed doors of Family
Courts; and families being torn
apart. The children and their
families appear to have no redress.
During 2005, I was collating
material to give to The General
Medical Council. Before she died, I
told Sophia that I wanted “to go
public” so that others could
possibly be saved such suffering.
She answered … “then it will all
have been worth it” … these were her
last words.
After Sophia died, I asked, as her
“personal representative” to see all
her notes. This was refused. I was
told that I would have to go through
the courts in order to access them.

I have read suggestions that 95% of
professionals and public do not
believe that such an illness is
possible. Of the people who dealt
with us, about 50% said that Sophia
was making herself ill so that she
could get attention. The rest said
that I was keeping her ill so that I
could have some meaning in my life.
A mixture said that she just wasn’t
ill at all, that it was all “in the
mind”. I do feel that I owe it to
Sophia and all the other sufferers
and their families not to allow this
story to be airbrushed out of
history. I have over 190 letters
written between 2000 - 2003 to back
up everything that I have said. In
no less than 66 of these, was it
said that Sophia has severe ME.

The inquest on Sophia is planned to
be held on Tuesday13th
June 2006. Once this is completed
we are planning to open up a website
so that others are made aware of
what is being done to people who
suffer from ME. There, we will be
posting more detailed information of
Sophia’s “treatment”. We also wish
to use this site later on as a
directory for the names of those
doctors, scientists, organisations
or individuals, in the U.K., who
really do believe that they, like
the World Health Organisation,
recognise that this is a physical
neurological disease, and treat it
accordingly. We hope that it will
make it easier for all ME sufferers
and their families, as well as
professionals, to have instant
access to many names that they can
trust. The intention is that this
site will be reviewed regularly.
Hopefully, the proposed website
could be linked to other websites of
similar interests to publicise best
practices.

Following the loss of Sophia, I and
my family feel we are free to speak
the facts as experienced by Sophia.
Whatever we say or write now will
not bring her back to us. Sophia
wanted to get better and live, but
she needed to be able to live as a
“free person”, not ruled by fear,
incarcerated behind the locked doors
of a mental hospital. This was not
allowed. In order to get “help”,
she had to agree that she was
mentally ill; this she would not
do. She lived her beliefs. I have
never in my life known a braver or
more courageous person than Sophia.
She was an inspiration to us all. I
do believe that every parent would
say exactly the same about their
child who is suffering from ME. It
was Sophia’s wish that her living
and suffering should not be in vain,
but that it would help others. Only
time will tell.

Sophia
1973 - 2005 It was a privilege to
have known her.
by
Criona Wilson (Sophia’s
mother)